Kamala Harris appears on Hope not Hate naughty list

The US Democratic party’s future hope for the Presidency has appeared on a Hope not Hate baddy list along with figures like Milo Yiannopolous and Richard Spencer.

blue and white hate has no home here printed signage
Photo by Johan Bos on Pexels.com

 

Research was carried out by a Youtuber called Jake Lloyd who dug through the lower levels of this 3D hate model exposing the fact that just communicating with certain accounts, even if you were doing so to disagree with their content could get you on the list.

Mr Lloyd calls Hope not Hate the ANTIFA but in reality they are funded by the British Government and enjoy co-operation and promotion from most State organs including the BBC.

Hope not Hate also operate in Northern Ireland, helping violent Republicans select their targets.

 

Lucy Brown the Establishment’s Rosetta Stone

The Establishment appears to be trying to use Lucy Brown, a former black lives matter activist as some sort of Rosetta Stone to build a narrative on the “far right.”

Who she works for and her motivations for doing what she does is unclear but she seems to be recording the BBC and MSM and uploading some pretty damning material that looks like conspiracy to libel.

I don’t like the idea of people imitating violent French yellow vests because the optics are bad but the yellow vests UK say they are non-violent and so far it looks like that is true.

How do Common Purpose use signal theory?

Hate crime and (now) signal law where people can use the State against others they perceive to have offended them does to Politics what Global warming theory has done to the fossil fuel industry. It allows the Globalists to control it and provides them with excuses that their panicky press organs repeat again and again.

Further to that people are taught to expect violent and antisocial behaviour from people protesting grooming gangs and are terrified of ending up on some blacklist.

 

There is a whole pseudoscience growing up around hate crime and it links in with the likes of Siobhan O’Niell’s Irish people have violence in their DNA code theory. The globalists, Common Purpose and the Borg like husks of institutions these people inhabit will continue to ramp up the psudoscience and the weird theories until they have a demon headmaster style control over society.

Some things to look out for are “signal theory” and dosing of the like of Propranolol. There is already wide scale clandestine use of propranolol in the UK to target people Police believe might not support rape gangs.

The link on Propranolol.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9129029/Blood-pressure-drug-reduces-in-built-racism.html

What happens with the Propranolol is Police have your doctor prescribe you with it, the excuse is usually given as helping your anxiety. Usually people at loggerheads with Police over the rape of a loved one will be anxious because of harassment and threats from public agencies and certain communities involved in grooming. What the Propranolol will do is make you very tired, you will get home from work and crawl into bed every night. Just how they want it.

Signal theory is another beauty on the horizon in short it is supposed to be an event that sends a message out to a target community. One example of a signal event that it’s Guardian contributor creator Martin McInnes cites is 9/11 but the real sting in the tail of this signal thing is that it goes right down to the micro level of the like of handing out leaflets, voicing opinions on social media or even something like an Orange Order March. The real intention of it is to allow Police to crack down on people voicing anti-immigration views or folks celebrating their culture. There would be no use for the signal crimes it was just to conflict large terror events as those have their own sets of laws. This is purely to stop us yobbos talking about grooming gangs waving the oul Jack about etc.

What apparently makes a signal a crime is it’s effect on a community’s perception of safety. This is obviously open to abuse by groups and vexy/radicalised individuals throughout society. The target will overwhelmingly be that old enemy of Marxism, the straight white Protestant male.

The PSNI have already begun attempting to charge people using signal theory, cases include leaflets calling for action over crimes, many serious caused by migrants from Eastern Europe.

People should have a reasonable expectation of safety and if that isn’t available they should be able to organise to lobby for that safety to be provided.

Women’s rights and welfare as a tool of class war

Intelligent elites in Universities all over the West have been on a search for ways to increase the profit for the corporations and foundations that fund their research. This research has been undertaken in earnest since the early 1960s.

black and white working old human
Photo by Vijay Putra on Pexels.com

It has often come under the guise of “rights” or of trying to increase motivation and therefor the production in workers. I have studied both in detail and the bedrock of both is deception. Deception as to the intention of policies or practices born out of this research and on the ground deception in so far as within the corporate environment the worker rarely knows the value of the product of his labour.

The left claim to be searching for an ideal society where everyone is an equal participant but their outlets promote a number of deceptions, often a lot more insidious and than the regular and more subtle deceptions employed in artful bargaining within ordinary capitalism.

Women’s rights in the workplace have displaced a huge slew of working class managers and reduced relative wages. The higher management positions are taken up by existing upper middle class networks who employ accents and postcodes rather than race or gender politics as a way of ingroup identification.

Welfare has the crushing effect of over taxing small businesses often operated by working class people into the ground whilst ensuring the welfare recipients stagnate at an absolute minimum of consumption, usually only emerging from this when their labour is absolutely crucial to upper middle class profit.

This is not to say that women’s rights or welfare are bad things but to say that in the right environment they are a tool of control for the elites who are aware of ways to make their policies fairer but choose not to in order to profit.

The right holds the answer to these questions in so far as the natural route of the economy, although imperfect is always fairer than the elite proposition as the elite will always conspire against the public good. So it is a case of either identifying ways to enhance working class mobility on the whole, rather than using distractions such a partial emancipation for ethnic groups and so forth. Labour say they are for the whole proletariat but only promote good wages for tiny sections of society whilst leaving the majority of the working class unrepresented.