PSNI admit “Evidence is not the test” of a hate crime

Common Purpose is forging forward with it’s “evidence” gathering. This is “evidence” that there is an army of Neo-Nazis running around persecuting new arrivals and enforcing sexual norms. The evidence is used both to justify Common Purpose as it is now as well as to ask for more powers.

These are the new statistics.

foto_no_exif

I’m surprised we aren’t seeing these scare crows yet. Although these days I guess they use social media to mimic straight white males and straw man our political positions.

foto_no_exif

Anyway….

With regard to the chart above, the figures on the left are hate incidents, i.e. where a “hate attack” has occured but the law was not sufficient to bring the perpetrator to justice. These stats are being recorded with the view to add more hate crime laws.

The figures on the right are hate crimes where there was a crime or there was perceived to be a crime.  So from the figure of 1,045 for 2017 to even find a hate crime where someone has criticised a religion you would have to remove the stats in these occaisions;

  • A hoax, possibly politically motivated or someone looking for better housing etc
  • A hoax perpetrated by the left, Common Purpose or the ANTIFA to further their agenda/gain funding.
  • The “victim” perceived contact where there was none, (microaggressions, facial ticks) where the white “aggressor” has not perceived contact. This could be something like whitie looking at his phone, laughing at a meme and passing a Pakistani who believes whitie is laughing at him, in contravention of Pakistani street etiquette.
  • In South America thumbs up can be an insult, so maybe whitie was cheerfully giving the thumbs up and the victim thinks whitie will put his thumb up his ass. The smile was just perceived as sheer madness and willingness to carry out the attack.

Yeah there are lots of these possibilities. Check out the website below for examples with website links.

http://www.fakehatecrimes.org/

The PSNI Perception test.

“Evidence is not the test when reporting a hate incident; when an incident or crime has been reported to police by the victim or by any other person and they perceive it as being motivated by prejudice or hate, it will be recorded and investigated as a hate incident or crime. The perception of the victim, or any other person is the
defining factor in determining whether an incident is a hate incident, or in recognising the hostility element of a hate crime. Perception-based recording refers to the perception of the victim, or any other person. It would not be appropriate to record a crime or incident as a hate crime or hate incident if it was based on the perception of
a person or group who had no knowledge of the victim, crime or the area, and who may be responding to media or internet stories or who are reporting for a political or similar motive. The other person could, however, be one of a number of people, including: police officers or staff; witnesses; family members; civil society organisations
who know details of the victim, the crime or hate crimes in the locality, such as a third-party reporting charity; a carer or other professional who supports the victim; someone who has knowledge of hate crime in the area – this could include many professionals and experts such as the manager of an education centre used by people
with learning disabilities who regularly receives reports of abuse from students; a person from within the group targeted with the hostility, eg, a Traveller who witnessed racist damage in a local park.”

The article about the scarecrow.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/taranaki-daily-news/news/106774947/buddy-the-scarecrows-dance-moves-cause-controversy-after-being-confused-with-nazi-salute

 

Common Purpose lose landmark case in Bath

Common Purpose has been using Police to drive anyone they don’t like off the streets using Hate Crime law and dispersal notices that were supposedly to combat hooliganism. Christians who preach in public have been particularly under threat.

One case saw a Mr Dale McAlpine complain after being threatened with arrest in Bath, he was later driven out of the city with the threat of Police using force against him. After lengthy complaint procedures and support from Christian groups the Common Purpose heavy Avon and Somerset Police had to apologise.

Source:

https://www.christian.org.uk/news/ci-victory-street-preacher-puts-spotlight-police-powers/?e051018

Common Purpose proof.

https://www.cpexposed.com/documents/avon-and-somerset-police-admit-spending-%C3%A2%C2%A313951-your-money-common-purpose

Common Purpose has convicted people for quoting verses in the Bible. Take a second to let that sink in.

DEFUND COMMON PURPOSE

The NPC Question (1027 words)

The Church of Entropy

People have once again shown their complete and utter lack of self-awareness by getting offended at the “NPC” meme.

2018-09-18_15-45-04

The Birth of a Titan

Scientific research indicating that people don’t all have an inner voice has been around for a long time – that Psychology Today article was dated 2011. The revelation was too overwhelming for people to assimilate it all at once, because people are all susceptible to projection. Projection is when you assume that other people’s state of mind is more like your own than it actually is. It is a coping mechanism which encourages social cohesion. People are going to be more sympathetic towards those they consider “most like” themselves and so it is natural to assume the mental state of those around you is pretty much identical to your own. However, science proves this impression largely false, given that (as much as (more research is needed…

View original post 887 more words

Get the L out

Lesbians don’t have dicks!

A group calling itself”Get the L out” has splintered from the LGBTQ+ movement. I have sort of seen this coming for a while. Ultimately what Lesbians want is women, mostly white borderline women asuch lesbians are competing with white men, refugees and latterly trannys.

Lesbians are practical in their approach and are super pissed women are being “encouraged to suck dicks.” They alledge, probably rightly that the LGBTQ+ movement is trying to introduce trannys into Lesbian culture.

What are the dangers of Common Purpose?

In asking the question “What are the dangers of Common Purpose?” we are sort of transporting ourselves back to the 1950’s or even earlier, before the British, European and US elites decided to give this globalism thing a good go. We are kind of pretending we have a choice in this or can effect our future by voting. As we have seen with the recent suspension of Jolene Bunting we can’t vote our way out of this, the establishment have multiple layers in place to safeguard their special interest.

common-purpose-effect

Who are the Establishment? Well they are elites, financial elites, academics and civil servants that move in their circles and feed off them. Together this class of people forms what they are talking about today as the “Deep State”, “the Swamp” or in their academic circles “the Cathedral.”

So, this is not a history of Common Purpose, in fact the history of Common Purpose is secretive, how it became accepted as the Angloshpere’s professional version of the Masons is unclear. We do know that Tony Blair greatly expanded it’s power and it was under Tony Blair and through the Labour structure that it really started to grab Councils, Police forces, branches of the Judiciary and so on. The likelihood is that it is a vessel for Fabian Socialism, many of it’s original people were members of the Communist Party of Great Britain.

The problems that come with Common Purpose come with most collectivist organisations, specially ones that use secrecy, threats and people in position to attack their enemies. The Pyramid structure of Common Purpose is a key element in the organisation, as are the various degrees, set out as courses that one completes and consequently the level of the “understanding of diversity” that one needs to be moral and hence competent.

The courses give the organisation a structure and system, similar to the education system in 19th century Britain, that allows the elites to keep people out of public/profitable life by saying that they are incapable of being moral or effective in responsible roles because of their lack of education. Common Purpose also selects it’s people rather than just having anyone apply for a role. Usually Common Purpose will have been in contact with an individual from their school days through essay competitions and such that enable CP to identify malleable, sympathetic and compliant people.

Common Purpose works seamlessly with other elite projects like the Rockefeller Resilient Cities program, George Soro’s fronts like Amnesty and media outlets like the Guardian and the BBC.

The problem with so many organisations working together is that if something goes wrong, if there is crime, something like an elite pedophile scandal for example the pyramid structure can be used to crush the public servants, namely Police officers at the bottom who are supposed to be dealing with it. We have seen this kind of thing in full swing in Rotherham and even in Northern Ireland when the Police and BBC worked together to demonise and arrest Pedophile hunters who were exposing their ineptitude.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-43049316

Pre-Common Purpose the Police would not be under pressure to cover up for rape gangs, they would not have to cater to a greedy class of banker or businessman who wants to reduce labour costs whilst increasing the housing prices and so forth. In the Common Purpose Britain they do and the results are chilling, like that in the article below.

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/police-knew-grooming-gangs-were-9518461

Insider trading

There is risk of a great deal of insider and buddy trading with Common Purpose, the organisation provides the excuse for networks public and private and for meet ups like Belfast’s CEF forum that would otherwise draw attention. People from the council should not be lunching with people from private companies and so forth because there is potential for a conflict of interest. The revolving door has seen people making odd decisions in the past like taking on big PFIs as a member of a Health board or Council and then going on to work for a company linked to the lender. Common Purpose potentially provides opportunities for this kind of thing.

Judicial/Police revolving door

There is the problem of the revolving door between various sectors, I have come across a good example today with researching the Deputy Commissioner of Standards that suspended Jolene Bunting. His name is Ian Gordon OBE, he has been a Policeman, a Judicial Ombudsman, then a Political Ombudsman. This sort of thing is totally ridiculous that you would have someone knighted by the Queen, who used to be a Policeman and a Judicial Ombudsman making decisions on who can be elected in Northern Ireland. Why don’t we just call him “Governor Gordon” and give him a big billy club?

Bullying and misuse

We have seen a great deal of bullying from Common Purpose, it has gone to the extent of setting up secret courts and imprisoning it’s critics. Some of whom have been jailed for long periods of time and bullied by Common Purpose operatives within the Prison Service who, wishing for promotion are willing to refuse parole and good living standards.

The plight of Melanie Shaw is probably the most obvious example, but the attempt to kill Tommy Robinson in Prison is another stand out.

https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/melanie-shaw-given-two-years-following-secret-court-hearing

Common Purpose relies on our silence, a lot of good civil servants and private workers will have a weight off their shoulders when we manage to defund and eject it.

DEFUND COMMON PURPOSE!

 

 

 

 

Common Purpose Republican overthrows Unionist Councillor

Jolene Bunting has been suspended by a Common Purpose Bureaucrat. This essentially means that we have no Democracy anymore and that they can just simply remove our elected officials on the scant grounds that someone might have been offended by comments or memes that were shared.

foto_no_exif

We have already exposed the background of Marie Anderson, the active left winger (with all Ireland sympathies) who was crowned as an all powerful Ombudsman by Common Purpose after the failure of the Pastor McConnell trial to provide the courts as a tool for the Republican left.

Read about her here.

https://screwcommunism.com/2018/09/14/marie-anderson-and-lawcentre-ni-the-shadow-government/

Jolene’s interview with Mr Vance on the issue.

 

Marie Anderson and Lawcentre NI: the shadow Government

Understanding how the elite interact with working class Protestants in Northern Ireland is going to be really important in our defence of our culture and way of life in years to come. The same is true for working class Nationalist communities and even other communities of working class people across the West today. The far left, super rich elites and wage bugs are allying to implement plans that will devastate our communities and leave us very poor and in danger of violence.

Marie Anderson is the dictatorial Ombudsman who has targeted and seeks to remove Cllr Jolene Bunting from her role as elected Councillor.

In Northern Ireland we have allowed a fairly small number of mainly lefty Psudo-Republican Queen’s and Ulster University grads take over the whole of the system. These people are dreamers who have never lived or worked in the real World and to a man and woman despise working class Protestants, often holding views and perceptions stripped from the pages of New York Communist Propaganda from the 1970s.

Lawcentre NI is a great example of one of their front organisations, it has been at the forefront of organising the vexy trials of soldiers and pushing endless investigations often with profit being the main motivation.

With six figure wages and the promise of more if they can drum up more lefty legal appeals these guys are very comfortable.

Below Marie Anderson with Ursula O’Hare with heads tilted back laughing jubilantly as their powers over us are extended in the wake of the Pastor McConnell trial.

foto_no_exif

Lawcentre NI is part of the Common Purpose Nexus that uses State legal power, media power etc to further Globalist goals. Below is a video they put out, one in a series of videos where they call for “Family reunification” to be extended and label being given asylum seeker allowance (more than the dole) as “destitution.”

We are now at the stage we need to think, should we let the far left run this country and give them the power to remove our Unionist Politicians? Also why is mainstream Unionism unaware or going along with this? A lot of what these guys are pushing would even be to the left of the UUP.